What Facet Are the ‘All-In Pod’ Bros On?

When Donald Trump and Elon Musk lastly had their large blowout last week, followers of the All-In podcast knew the following episode was going to be one to observe. There’s only one little downside: The All-In boys didn’t launch a brand new episode like everybody anticipated this week. And people on social media have observed.

The present options 4 extremely rich males who’re buddies with Musk and have devoted themselves to carrying water for Trump. You’ve obtained Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, and David Friedberg, who all determined in the summertime of 2024 to debase themselves within the title of supporting a fascist. They’d Trump on the present and lobbed softball questions as Trump rambled about synthetic intelligence and different matters he knew nothing about. The fourth host, David Sacks, went a step additional, even becoming a member of the administration because the so-called “crypto czar” after Trump’s election win.

So it is smart that individuals would need to hear what these guys need to say in regards to the present controversy, which began comparatively small. Final week, Musk expressed frustration with the Republican funds invoice for not chopping sufficient, Trump mentioned he was disillusioned in Musk, after which it was off to the races. Musk went nuclear claiming Trump was “within the Epstein information,” a reference to the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and Trump mentioned he would possibly cancel Musk’s contracts with the federal government. Musk depends on billions in authorities cash to maintain his companies, particularly SpaceX.

Issues seem to have calmed down a bit, with Musk deleting a few of his most incendiary tweets, together with one suggesting Trump must be impeached and changed by Vice President JD Vance. And Musk posted two American flags in a quote-tweet of Vance’s submit about Trump’s management on Sunday, largely taken as an indication he’s nonetheless solidly on Trump’s facet. However the relationship between the 2 males is clearly fractured. It’s actually laborious to mainly accuse somebody of being a pedophile after which go proper again to being besties, because the All-In hosts name themselves.

However on the time of this writing, the All-In Guys haven’t come collectively to speak about it. The final episode was printed June 4 and it was an interview carried out by Friedberg with Jared Isaacman. It’s an attention-grabbing factor to hearken to, given the truth that Isaacman was dumped as Trump’s decide to be the NASA administrator shortly after Musk’s send-off from the Oval Workplace. The gist is that Isaacman thinks he was torpedoed by anti-Musk forces within the White Home who obtained into Trump’s ear about donations he beforehand made to Democrats. However Isaacman rightly identified that his outdated donations to Democrats had been no secret. And it looks like after Musk and Trump’s blowout, individuals who had been anti-Musk noticed their alternative to pounce. Isaacman is a pal of Musk’s and is extra centered on attending to Mars somewhat than the Moon, very similar to Musk. And there are many apparent assumptions that individuals have been making about how Musk would profit by having his pal as the top of NASA, an company that delivers huge contracts to SpaceX.

Whereas the episode with Isaacman touched on the Musk-Trump drama, it didn’t present the gabby four-way dialog All-In listeners are used to listening to between Palihapitiya, Calacanis, Friedberg, and Sacks. Or at the very least a three-way dialog, given the truth that Sacks has been ducking out of episodes fairly ceaselessly since he joined the administration. Sacks appears fairly uncomfortable anytime there’s criticism of something Trump is doing. Calacanis has at all times been probably the most Democratic-curious of the bunch, even when he bent the knee like everybody else throughout that ridiculous episode again in June 2024. And Sacks has been snippy at Calacanis on a couple of event over the faintest trace of dissent on Trump’s tariffs.

What do these guys—”buddies” of Musk and allies of Trump—need to say in regards to the scenario? People on social media would like to know. And individuals are making plenty of jokes about it. “All-in podcast going darkish this week just like the information broadcast throughout a coup when the result isn’t but clear,” author Matthew Zeitlin wrote on X.

Folks have additionally taken to asking Grok what’s holding all the pieces up. However the AI doesn’t have a definitive reply.

“It’s robust to say definitively why the All-In podcast skipped this week’s episode, because the hosts haven’t shared an official purpose,” Grok responded to 1 consumer Sunday. “The timing suggests it may very well be tied to the Trump-Musk feud, a sizzling subject they’d seemingly cowl given their concentrate on tech and politics. It’s a delicate subject, so that they is perhaps taking additional time to border it fastidiously.”

There are rumors floating round on-line that they really recorded an episode and it’s being suppressed for some purpose. Who can be doing the suppressing isn’t actually clear, although Calacanis is most within the tank for Musk, and Sacks, being within the administration, is most supportive of Trump. There’s additionally hypothesis that maybe the hosts need to see if Musk and Trump really reconcile in some significant manner earlier than they are saying something.

The 4 males are additionally totally able to simply diverting consideration if that’s the best way they need to play it. All of them are fairly expert at saying issues in a assured matter-of-fact manner that listeners take as gospel in the event that they don’t really know something in regards to the matters being mentioned. Throughout a recent discussion about Trump getting a free $400 million airplane from the federal government of Qatar, Palihapitiya tried to argue that it’s merely Qatari tradition to present lavish items and also you’re really being insulting should you don’t take bribes like that.

“There are customs, I assume, and who am I to guage these customs, that to us may appear extreme or untoward or perhaps an try at graft, however to them is definitely an indication of deep respect,” Palihapitiya mentioned. Then he pivoted into asking why the media wasn’t speaking about extra necessary issues.

No matter occurs with the following episode, individuals are going to be extraordinarily disillusioned in the event that they don’t tackle the elephant within the room. However there’s nothing that’s forcing them to speak in regards to the factor that’s staring them proper within the face. In any case, Musk accused Trump of being within the Epstein information, suggesting the billionaire oligarch was completely completely satisfied ignoring one thing morally inexcusable to get what he needed. Allegedly. It’s completely attainable the All-In guys simply barely contact on the controversy in probably the most shallow manner and transfer on.